Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Evolution-Data Optimized service providers (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

List of Evolution-Data Optimized service providers
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I consider it necessary to have a new discussion based on the fact that this page is actually a duplicate of List of CDMA2000 networks where all information seems to be available with sources already. The latter page is already linked from the main article Evolution-Data Optimized. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  17:00, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  17:00, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:33, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as I question whether this can be better improved and the article could still use better work thus Delete at best for now. SwisterTwister   talk  22:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, postdlf (talk) 13:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of CDMA2000 networks. While in principle there is nothing wrong with having a list-class article like this, in practice the EVDO status of providers is already indicated in List of CDMA2000 networks and it is more informative and better referenced. Hence I recommend redirect because List of Evolution-Data Optimized service providers is redundant with List of CDMA2000 networks and it would be good to provide a pointer to the better list. --Mark viking (talk) 18:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I think that a #REDIRECT is not even necessary here, as this page does not seem to be widely linked from other pages. The wiki-links in Evolution-Data Optimized have already been replaced. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 08:51, 7 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Agreed, the article should be deleted and a #REDIRECT is not needed. Drahtlos (talk) 13:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - Please note that the article is basically simply a list of a tossed number of companies and it's unsourced not to mention with nothing else suggesting it stay a separate article itself. SwisterTwister   talk  05:07, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as duplicated and unncessary. Chrisw80 (talk) 06:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.