Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Fantasy Books with Happy Endings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:48, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

List of Fantasy Books with Happy Endings

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD. List does not have acceptable reliable sources and does not meet WP:GNG and may contain Original Research WP:OR. - Stillwaterising (talk) 04:17, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources, "happy" is inherently POV, many other comments here are purely the subjective opinion of the article creator(s). I dont see any way this can stay here, as its pure OR.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete lest we encourage List of Fantasy Books with Unhappy Endings and List of Fantasy Books with Ambiguous Endings. Way too broad a classification to be useful. Plus the current emphasis on secular vs Christian and "Adult content" suggest an underlying agenda. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:40, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Well, the unhappy ending is that this going to be deleted for the reasons listed above. The happy ending is that it stayed up four months longer than might have been expected, and lots of people looked at the list while it was up.  It was an interesting idea, but it's appropriate for a forum on fantasy fiction, not for an online encyclopedia.  Look around, some of your favorite series probably have a wiki of their own.   Mandsford (talk) 18:12, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The first few lines ('Please add to this list') say it all, if the article did survive this RFA (which it probably won't), I doubt sources would arrive on it for dozens of days. --Andromedabluesphere440 (talk) 19:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.