Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Fashion 5.0 cover models


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:32, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

List of Fashion 5.0 cover models

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )


 * Delete. Non-notable list. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Notable list of talent, including Tenley Molzahn, Ali Fedotowsky, Shwayze and Alexis Bellino. --Morganmyrmo (talk) 04:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * This editor may have a conflict of interest because of an involvement in the media industry. See . -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not the fact that the editor is involved in the media industry that creates a conflict of interest. It's the fact that the editor has the same name (Morgan Myrmo) as the founder/publisher of the Fashion 5.0 magazine whose list of cover models is under discussion here. That said, the editor is allowed to express his opinions here even if he is the publisher of the magazine, although he ought to disclose that fact. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Seems likely that a list of several celebrities is notable. --Morganmyrmo (talk) 04:32, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Not necessarily. This is a list of models on the cover of a regional magazine published in San Diego County, California in the United States. The magazine itself if bordering on being non-notable for WP let alone a list of the cover models! -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Talent may be notable but that does not mean the a talent list is notable. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 12 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The magazine itself is not extremely notable given that it is only distributed regionally and has existed for less than two years. Of the sixteen people listed as having been on the cover so far, only three have Wikipedia articles of their own (two others are blue links but their names link to TV shows they have been on rather than separate articles). I don't see a great need for this list. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. While lists can be a good thing, this is just too trivial. The magazine itself is barely notable. If we MUST have this info, it belongs on Fashion 5.0 and not on a separate Wikipedia page - only a very few magazines have similar lists and we're talking Vogue, Marie Claire, etc... BIG internationally known magazines. Mabalu (talk) 17:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. There is no other regional magazine with such celebrity coverage. --Gracophilus (talk) 11:02, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: How is this not extremely notable or barely notable? It is not notable at all according to my searches and none of the websites in the article are reliable sources. SL93 (talk) 20:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Wetpaint.com is rated as the 1890th largest website in the world according to Alexa.com --Gracophilus (talk) 23:18, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Wetpaint just has a Youtube video and a paragraph. How does that show notability? SL93 (talk) 23:32, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I also still doubt it being a reliable source when it's called The Bachelorette Fansite. SL93 (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. There has been a lot of refactoring of this discussion by Gracophilus who also went under the name of Morganmyrmo. It is too complicated to unravel. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:08, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I think we're okay. Most of the items that Gracophilus removed pertained to their duplicate voting, but they are no longer attempting to vote twice, so those items are not relevant any more. Besides that, the other deleted content has been restored. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:21, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is trivia at best. Lady  of  Shalott  13:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Playboy has a list, as well as other fashion magazines. --Gracophilus (talk) 19:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you seriously comparing this magazine to Playboy? SL93 (talk) 20:54, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.