Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Flybe destinations (1979–2020)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:43, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

List of Flybe destinations (1979–2020)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Basically per WP:NOT, particularly WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:NOTCATALOGUE. Additionally per the 2018 RFC which was followed by AN discussion that concluded that these articles should be AFD'd in an orderly manner with a link to the original RFC discussion and that it should be taken into account in any close. This is simply an exhaustive listing of all services provided by a commercial enterprise, and not encyclopaedic content which is supposed to be a summary of what is said in secondary sources. It differs in no substantial regard to a complete listing of locations run by Burger King.

Even if the RFC were over-turned, and the WP:NOT issues removed somehow, the article would still need to pass WP:CORP (particularly WP:AUD), which would basically be impossible in this case. The article is supported only by Flybe's website, and a 404 page on the non-RS routesonline.com website. My WP:BEFORE search found nothing relevant. FOARP (talk) 14:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation, Lists,  and United Kingdom. FOARP (talk) 14:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: Friends, in the shadow of WP:NOT's stern decree, I sorrowfully support this deletion. Wikipedia, our digital sentinel, guards notable facts, not trifles. Regrettably, we must cull the insignificant. We champion quality, a task demanding both delicacy and ruthlessness. Thus, I echo the somber call for deletion. Jack4576 (talk) 14:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 *  Keep Delete (but bundle henceforth): I fail to see why this particular airline destination list (or the other two listed in RfD today) is any more or less notable and encyclopedic than any of the numerous other airline destination lists that still exist despite that 2018 RfC, including many for defunct airlines. If the intention is really to delete all airline destination lists, then let's do it in a single RfD. Rosbif73 (talk) 15:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. FOARP (talk) 19:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per FOARP, and especially per the RfC outcome. --Tserton (talk) 20:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Since there are simultanoeus RfDs involving different lists of airline destinations I propose to center the discussion in a single page.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 21:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator. Nythar  (💬-🍀) 23:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.