Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of GMA Network stations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Courcelles (talk) 18:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

List of GMA Network stations

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Topic lacks sources supporting that WP:NLIST is met. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Philippines.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm guessing that it will turn out to meet NLIST, but if it doesn't, merge into GMA Network. It's short enough that it wouldn't be awkward. small jars 09:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Spin-out lists such as this one are generally exempt from WP:NLIST where merging it back to the parent article would become too large. Secondly, it serves a designated, internal navigational purpose, where most of the entries have links to Wikipedia pages. Why? I Ask (talk) 11:43, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . That is a good point about the parent article becoming too large. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: per Why? I Ask. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 23:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep There's a reason you're on ANI, Snoozy, and this nom set is not helping your case at all. This isn't getting deleted and a list of network affiliates can easily be sourced. If you're not asking for deletion, there are talk pages you should be using regarding article content, and AfD is not meant for this purpose at all.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 02:59, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge Not seeing enough justification for keeping. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 05:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep as a reasonable WP:SIZESPLIT. Meets WP:NLIST per above arguments. SBKSPP (talk) 00:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.