Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Game Gear multiplayer games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Categorise is an action to be taken after the Keep. Deathphoenix ʕ 14:03, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

List of Game Gear multiplayer games
Useless list. SeizureDog 02:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * delete Too narrow Adambiswanger1 02:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Edit and Expand If this list were to be put as one and has more information added. OTAKU 04:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - "Useless" doesn't mean nothing.--Pokipsy76 09:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Double negatives don't mean much, neither. Listcruft of no valid encyclopedic worth or value. doktorb | words 09:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, there's Category:Game Gear games. - Motor (talk) 11:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: does not distinguish between single- and multi-player games
 * Comment, commenter didn't care about the difference and doesn't consider it worth noting. - Motor (talk) 16:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Listcruft that we have categories to manage - Peripitus (Talk) 12:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but preferably convert to new category (subcat of Category:Game Gear games). AvB &divide; talk  14:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Uselessness is not criteria for deletion. Besides, it IS useful. -- Chris  Ccool2ax   contrib.  15:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Categorise per AvB; this would be far more useful as a category than a list, and the subcategory system would work perfectly to distinguish single-player and multi-player games if, as it appears, there are people who care about the distinction. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 17:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Categorise Hohenberg 18:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Categorize- why have a list when a category could do the job so much better? Reyk  YO!  20:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk  to Nihonjo e  17:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Categorise per above. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  17:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Categorise Niao. --03:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 'Categorize. --maru  (talk)  contribs 17:02, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.