Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of German Open Men's Singles champions in badminton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  05:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

List of German Open Men's Singles champions in badminton

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No references to support the list, source mentioned in the article just tells about the winners, not the finalists and winners are already nentioned in German Open article of all five categories. zoglophie 05:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. zoglophie 05:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. zoglophie 05:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. zoglophie 05:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Bobherry  Talk   Edits  02:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If the main argument is that some references are missing, should not the article be tagged with "Reference needed" or something similar instead of deleting the complete article? MontanNito (talk) 20:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment we generally do not have separate articles for each category. And even if this list is kept, are we going to ignore that it has been fully unreferenced since it's creation 15 years ago? The bottom of the page show us one source, it does not give details about the finalists/Runners-up. The other 2 lists are even worse. Redirecting to the main article could be an option, though. zoglophie 07:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete unsourced list, though the topic itself is notable. I could potentially change to keep if properly sourced.  Frank   Anchor  18:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced list. Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 18:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.