Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of German Open Women's Singles champions in badminton (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 03:59, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

List of German Open Women's Singles champions in badminton
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Last Afd was closed with the statement: The result was keep. "Consensus is that improvement is needed, not deletion." I was told to wait for six more months until article gets improved and becomes well sourced, which has clearly not happened to this date. This article is a clear WP:FORK of main German Open (badminton) article and lacks enough sources for verification. zoglophie 12:38, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Badminton, Lists of people, Sports and Germany. zoglophie 12:38, 21 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Sorry, but "improvements were not made in the timeframe I wanted" is not an argument for deletion. As was discussed in the prior AfD, this is a discrete list of notable subject matter that was WP:SPLIT from the full article, as is common to do for every main sports championship article on Wikipedia. It is easily sourced and referenced. Just because those sources aren't currently added to the article isn't a reason for deletion. Silver  seren C 13:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You are just repeating your past argument . And I don't get what you mean by "those sources". See this This is not how lists are prepared and one must see how incomplete the list currently is and probably will remain as it is in future. Somehow you still want to keep articles like these in Wikipedia?! zoglophie 13:18, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep and should look like de:German Open (Badminton)/Dameneinzel within one year. Florentyna (talk) 14:28, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence given that a separate article is warranted, especially when the article as it stands is just tables with no prose, rather than an encyclopedic article. Even list articles should have prose, and if worthwhile prose about this list cannot be written with good sources, then we don't need a separate article for these tables. The tables can be merged back into a parent article if necessary. The point on actually needing independent sources to show notability was made by in the previous AFD, but seems to have been totally ignored for some reason. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:43, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - AfD is not the place to litigate article improvement, and a recent consensus indicated that the topic was notable. matt91486 (talk) 01:15, 2 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.