Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Germania destinations

List of Germania destinations

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NOT, WP:NCORP, WP:V.

WP:NOT is failed because this is a complete listing of all the services offered by a company on a random date of no significance. This makes it a straight-forward failure of WP:NOTCATALOG no. 6 ("Listings to be avoided include [...] products and services") and WP:IINFO since there's no significance at all to the services offered by Germania in July 2018 and flights are listed even if they weren't major routes.

WP:NCORP is failed because there only two sources, one of which is the company website, the other of which is an article from Der Spiegel that does not cover the topic of which destinations Germania served. There is no evidence here at all that sourcing that could meet WP:ORGIND covers this topic and realistically the now-defunct company could be the only source of information for a listing of all the flights served by it in July 2018.

This is a WP:V failure because none of these sources are from July 2018, but this is par for the course for these articles. FOARP (talk) 08:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Aviation, Lists,  and Germany. FOARP (talk) 08:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep It's clear from Articles for deletion/List of British Airways destinations, which vacated the 2018 RFC, that there is not a broad consensus to delete these, and there should be a wider discussion such as discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines that may result in recommendations for reform rather than many duplicative AFDs. I am not going to debate your gish gallop on all of these – particularly the false, out-of-context nonsense that that is a forbidden catalogue, because providing what a transportation company does like this is obviously not "a resource for conducting business". Reywas92Talk 14:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The 2018 RFC is not relied on here, and WP:NOT is not the only grounds for deletion either - you've been on here long enough to know that the sourcing for this article is failing. Hell, we've both canned enough articles for having exactly this kind of sourcing. FOARP (talk) 21:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC) FOARP (talk) 21:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  16:52, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, numerous WP:NOT violations. Rosbif73 (talk) 09:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)