Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Girls' Generation concert tours


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

List of Girls' Generation concert tours

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:NLIST says Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. As a topic, the tours of Girls' Generation has not received WP:SIGCOV ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 21:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and South Korea. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{  Talk  }- 21:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women,  and Lists. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 21:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Valid information and navigational list, linking to articles about her individual concern tours.  D r e a m Focus  23:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * , have you read WP:NLIST? The topic of the group of items a.k.a tours by the artist needs to have received coverage as a topic. That means that tours by the artist need to be mentioned in reliable sources as a whole, not just summation of individual concerts amalgamated together. Also lists aren't for navigation, categories are. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 08:10, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Did you read the second paragraph or just the first? There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y") or what other criteria may justify the notability of stand-alone lists and Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability.  I've been participating in AFDs for lists for many years now, things like this are kept over 90% of the time.   D r e a m Focus  13:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep as a valid WP:SPLIT and WP:SPINOUT from the main Girls' Generation article. Per WP:SIZERULE, articles over 100 kb "should almost certainly be divided" . The main article presently consists of 179 kb of data. Despite this, merging back to the article would be a much better alternative compared to deletion, because the content of the list serves to improve the overall coverage of the band on Wikipedia. Outright deletion would simply make the encyclopedia less comprehensive and informative about the band. North America1000 14:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 07:17, 14 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.