Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Gnarls Barkley costumes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

List of Gnarls Barkley costumes

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is basically unsourced listcruft. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL (talk) 07:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Seriously? This I've got to see. Hmmmm... Well, it was better and worse than I thought. I don't know what to do with this "article". But kudos to whoever made it for having an interest in the subject and providing such unique and interesting content. It's hard for me to vote keep on soemthing that doesn't seem encyclopedic, but it's kind of cool. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Here's the diff that produced the article if it's any help.-Synchronism (talk) 08:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete It didn't belong in the Gnarls Barkley article, but not because it belongs in its own article. It just doesn't belong.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 22:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is just wonderful. It needs to be better sourced, but still, that's not impossible to do. Documenting Popular Culture for the Ages, there's my proposal for a new Wikipedia tagline. :) -- Mvuijlst (talk) 00:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * If it can be sourced, then maybe. But I looked at the article again and although people are adding more to it, they still aren't adding any actual sources. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL (talk) 17:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. I see nothing that would suggest this list to be of any importance. - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:19, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- First of all, it's totally unsourced. I suppose it's possible that some references can be found that verify some of the costumes, but there'll be nothing to show notability. Then there's our first pillar: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It contains encyclopedia articles. I just don't know how this could be considered a topic appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Reyk  YO!  03:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--even if this were sourced as well as the Ken Starr report, it'd still be unsuitable. Gnarls Barkley's customes, cool as they are, are not encyclopedic content. If they belong anywhere, they belong in the GB article. Drmies (talk) 15:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.