Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Great Floridians


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Icewedge (talk) 05:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

List of Great Floridians

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Huge list. None of these people have anything in common besides that they all received what appears to be a fairly common title. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This appears to be a valid spin-off from Great_Floridians(which gives the context, part of which should be copied over, and also explains the rules have become stricter. In addition, it adds additional information over the category (years).- Mgm|(talk) 20:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - useful, verifiable information that an inclusive encyclopedia ought to have. - Richard Cavell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. I agree with Mgm that this definitely needs some context, since "Great Floridians" is an honor from the Florida Secretary of State's office.  It still doesn't make up for the other thing that the Florida Secretary of State did in the year 2000.  Mandsford (talk) 03:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Yes, the article is lacking in context, but the list appears to be valid and satisfying of inclusion criteria. &mdash; neuro(talk) 06:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.