Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Great Lakes Hockey League teams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  04:59, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

List of Great Lakes Hockey League teams

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:CFORK Bhockey10 (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delete: This article contains duplicate info already included in the league's main article, and therefore not needed as a seperate article to wikipedia. --Bhockey10 (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant content fork. Stifle (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Great Lakes Hockey League 76.66.196.229 (talk) 05:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This is already covered in Great Lakes Hockey League and is redundant. Mandsford (talk) 15:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I am not certain the league itself is notable, much less a separate and duplicative list of teams. Resolute 14:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions.   —Resolute 14:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -Djsasso (talk) 15:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redundant, unnecessary, provides no information not already given in the main article on the league. Especially so when it is an amateur league and all of the teams are red links. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 22:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Over the years, as the composition of the league gradually shifts and changes, this list will certainly not seem redundant. Give it time. --Mr Accountable (talk) 05:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Can be included in main article like all other leagues. – Nurmsook!  talk...  16:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.