Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Gundam 00 Characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge, redirect, or whatever the consensus is, which is not deletion as far as I can tell, merge is not preformed by the closing admin. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 01:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

List of Gundam 00 Characters

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

An article, List of Anno Domini characters, is the one used. It had been vandalized as it was removed with List of Gundam 00 Characters established instead. Ominae (talk) 07:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with List of Anno Domini characters, although I can't find anything official that verifies that the continuity should be referred to as Anno Domini.-- TBC !?!  07:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect First, rename List of Anno Domini characters to List of Mobile Suit Gundam 00 characters to follow proper naming conventions and the MOS. Then redirect this copy to that newly renamed list. Collectonian (talk) 16:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   —Quasirandom (talk) 16:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete original research which fails notability and verifiabiility requirements. Edison (talk) 19:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  19:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Rename one of these articles, most likely List of Anno Domini characters, to List of Mobile Suit Gundam 00 characters as explained by Collectonian and merged/redirect the other to it. Using the name of the series is actually less ambiguous then using the name of the time line, or where ever Anno Domini came from. --Farix (Talk) 19:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Is Gundam 00 a TV series? If so, then this would fall under the arbcom injunction. Problem is the list has zero context and no lead at all so I can't tell. 23skidoo (talk) 13:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Mobile Suit Gundam 00 is, yes, a TV series, a recent incarnation of the large Gundam franchise. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The Arbcom injunction shouldn't apply to duplicate articles or forks. --Farix (Talk) 15:18, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * ArbCom injunction does not apply here &mdash; it was created after the injunction was passed. seresin | wasn't he just...? 00:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I disagree with this interpretation of the injunction. It is reasonably applied to all conduct of the same type., without quibbling about the date the article was made. Its the same problem regardless. My opinion only. DGG (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect and Merge as described above by TBC!?!, Collectonian and Farix. Highwind888 (talk) 00:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as per TBC. Edward321 (talk) 04:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  19:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I thought there already was a consensus, but just to pile on the wagon, merge as outlined by TBC!?!, Collectonian and Farix. —Quasirandom (talk) 22:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Seems that way to me as well. -- Ned Scott 05:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.