Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Gurren Lagann mecha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 21:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

List of Gurren Lagann mecha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is an overly in-depth list of plot elements that are not critical to the understanding of Gurren Lagann. It lacks any real world information from reliable, third party sources to establish overall notability for the topic, so this is something better suited to brief descriptions on the character list and Wikia. TTN (talk) 10:02, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:24, 28 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. No indication of real world importance. Suggest transwikifying to gurren lagan wikia (http://gurrenlagann.wikia.com/wiki/Tengen_Toppa_Gurren_Lagann_Wiki). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:03, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete- excessive unsourced in-universe fancruft. Reyk  YO!  21:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Who are we to decide what has "real world importance"? Calling somthing WP:FANCRUFT is not a valid reason for deletion. That seems non-NPOV. Has a number of primary source refs. The one secondary source is, however, questionable as RS. In any case, they don't actually need to be notable per WP:FICT. VMS Mosaic (talk) 09:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable in-universe list. DragonZero  ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 09:33, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 00:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Additional Comment Please keep in mind that WP:INUNIVERSE is only a guideline. While it is a valid reason to edit an article, it is not in and of itself a reason to delete one.  Yes, this article needs a copy edit to change some verb tenses and reword a few sentences per WP:INUNIVERSE. What I don't understand is why the goal is deletion instead of improvement? VMS Mosaic (talk) 04:36, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge referenced information to List of Gurren Lagann characters and delete the rest, no sense having references going to waste. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 02:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.