Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of H manga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:05, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

List of H manga
List better served as a cat. All blue links have been added to List of manga (except one that doesn't appear to be a manga. SeizureDog 03:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - it duplicates a category. Perhaps there could be a subcategory of hentai manga, but until then the list serves no purpose. - Richardcavell 05:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant to category, and the category is more comprehensive at this time. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 10:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. wikipediatrix 14:25, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment if there are red entries, it doesn't duplicate a category, especially if you don't want an article for every H-manga. 132.205.93.19 19:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a catalogue. There is no reason to list things we do not have articles about, and particularly not in a contextless list like this one that provides no information whatsoever about the redlinked manga. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 16:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- TheFarix (Talk) 03:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment First, it should be renamed to List of hentai manga, but just how do you differentiate between hentai manga and hentai dōjinshi? --TheFarix (Talk) 03:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete With all the doujinshi manga of varying levels of notability, there are way too many of these to list and maintain, so what's the criterion for inclusion? I say forget red links and let each article be subject to AfD.  Merging should take place on other factors, by series, by artist, by publisher, etc. - Wickning1 14:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; useless as it stands, and not particularly useful as a starting-point for anything else. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 16:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Neier 22:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.