Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Half-Life mods


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  03:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

List of Half-Life mods


Indiscriminate list. Wikipedia is not a repository. Punkmorten 23:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Listcruft. TJ Spyke 00:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, violates WP:NOT. - Tutmosis  00:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hard to believe people took that much time to create the list in the first place. Chubbles1212 02:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Quick Delete per nom. Liscruft (and a waste of time).  SkierRMH 07:35, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Pointless list (BTW from the title, I was expecting some mention of Keith Moon there). --Folantin 14:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Moreschi 15:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. The corresponding list for Half-Life 2 was nominated a few months ago and the result was a unanimous keep. Although this article is of lower quality than the Half-Life 2 article, it should not be deleted. --- RockMFR 23:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per RockMFR, seeing as we have an exemplary List of Half-Life 2 mods page as well. We should try to bring this list up to the same standard, otherwise it isn't providing anything above and beyond what categories can do.  Yamaguchi先生 22:54, 14 November 2006
 * Keep per Yamaguchi VegaDark 04:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Whisp e ring 01:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOT a repository of external links, which this is unlike the HalfLife 2 article. Userfy if someone wants to turn it into an acceptable article rather than a directory. ~ trialsanderrors 02:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.