Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Harry Potter chapter titles in other languages (2nd nomination)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 09:31, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

List of Harry Potter chapter titles in other languages
This article has no place in an encyclopedia. Though I am a huge Harry Potter fan, I can find no compelling reason to list the foreign language chapter titles of every chapter of every HP book. This is an English encyclopedia, and this article's contents amount to useless trivia that has no academic value...at all. Brendan OShea 20:18, 25 August 2005 (UTC)


 * For full disclosure's sake, I'll note that this page was previously listed for deletion in 2004. That discussion can be found here. --Brendan OShea 20:29, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * And a month later, discussed again here.
 * Delete. What's the point? Tonywalton | Talk 20:42, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per submitter. --GraemeL (talk) 21:23, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A list of Harry Potter book titles (which, hey, already exists) would be interesting, though. This is just excessive. I don't even particularly think a list of the chapter titles in English would be all that useful. (Get the book and read the table of contents. Really.) -Aranel (" Sarah ") 21:29, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, put English chapter titles in articles with book summaries and link to the articles in other wikipedias if you want to interligual. Just a list of chapter titles, provides no useful information and is in fact source material. (Can chapter titles be copyrighted?) - Mgm|(talk) 21:42, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pointless. —Charles O'Rourke 23:49, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useless!! --Neigel von Teighen 23:52, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm impressed with effort the author put into this article, but it's serious and bizzare cruft nonetheless. -PlainSight 04:17, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.