Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hi-NRG artists and songs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. None but the nominator favors deletion. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  23:14, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

List of Hi-NRG artists and songs

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

This article is a list of random songs with 1 external link with All Music Guide, but in the article are over 9000 songs that claims are "Hi-NRG". Obviously falls WP:SYNTH/WP:OR. RockandDiscoFanCZ (talk) 16:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Synthesis for a genre that lacks an article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep the list of artists, improve with sources, and lose the songs. This is most certainly a real genre (see Hi-NRG - it doesn't lack an article at all), and a lot of the artists can be sourced as such. The songs seem to be very WP:OR and somewhat random. --Michig (talk) 20:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


 * KeepOnce again the subject DOES have an article, and a quick look at google shows that the subject is notable and that many of the songs can be linked to the genre. Could be better refined but unsuitable for deletion. Weakopedia (talk) 22:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Listing all the notable songs in this genre is a perfectly acceptable list article.  D r e a m Focus  17:39, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep the list of artists and move to List of Hi-NRG artists. The list of songs would be more appropriate as a category. (Category:Hi-NRG songs) Am86 (talk) 03:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.