Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hi-tech companies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:46, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

List of Hi-tech companies

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

High tech is not defined, either at its article, or in this list. Thus, the inclusion criteria are impossibly vague. I would simply rename this "List of technology companies" but I am not sure it would be of much use even then (its such a small subset right now). article is still orphaned after years. (PS creator is banned)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Even "technology companies" is too vague. Category:Lists of companies by industry has plenty of lists that cover everything this list does, without jumbling it all together in this useless conglomerate. postdlf (talk) 05:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom, the inclusion criteria is far too vague. How is Atari, Inc. hi-tech? How is Atari related to McAfee? OSborn arfcontribs. 01:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Criteria for inclusion in this list are not established. We have unrelated companies like Business Objects, pertaining to business intelligence; eBay, engaged in online shopping; and Genentech, related to biotechnology. What is the nexus among these companies? •••Life of Riley (T–C) 19:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too vague a topic to have a list on it. CtP  (t • c) 20:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.