Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Holstein Artificial Insemination Bulls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  18:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

List of Holstein Artificial Insemination Bulls

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Orphaned, reference- and link-free article of no conceivable encyclopedic use, created by seller of one of the products and already blocked as spammer. PROD tag added, but removed by anon IP. Calton | Talk 21:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  13:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I do not support this article to be deleted, because it supports a part of the history of Artificial insemination in the Holstein breed. User:Glenridge —Preceding undated comment was added at 13:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)   — Glenridge (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wizardman  21:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete There are more appropriate places for this sort of information. DGG (talk) 03:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I thought when I read the AFD, that I would be supporting based on "not paper". However, as interesting as the list might be, I think the thing is more a vehicle for promoting an outside entity. It would seem to in fact lack verifiable third party sourcing. Not usre what claim to notability there might be.Dlohcierekim&#39;s sock (talk) 02:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - even allowing for "not paper", there is enough information in Holstein (cattle). JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This information is completely useless.  --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.