Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hook organs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  05:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

List of Hook organs

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

So the prod was removed with the reason that "Removing prod since this is the 2nd longest page in wikipedia". I'm thinking this is merely a copy of a list from some archive and therefore falls in WP:NOT. Also, its unsourced. Lastly, I can't see this ever being a useful list or article, unsalvagable. MBisanz 05:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NOT and WP:OR. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 06:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as the article's creator, I give my blessing. I wanted to move the extremely incomplete list from article about the builder, but figured some folks would flip if there wasn't a list SOMEWHERE. But I'm no more in favor of that huge list than anyone else. Please, delete it. BTW, it was sourced from the OHS database. Mr. P. S. Phillips (talk) 06:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a useful list. The gigantic size of the article should have no bearing on issues like this.  Lankiveil (talk) 07:29, 31 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete. As an Inclusionist, I tried to make the list useful by reducing its size and simplifying its format. It was an interesting exercise in edit skills ... not much more. I would like to suggest that a link be added to the basic E. and G.G. Hook & Hastings article that would direct readers to the OHS database mentioned by the article's creator, just in case they might want this info. Truthanado (talk) 14:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete long page of totally useless information. The person who created this list who actually voted "delete" above (if that's damning i don't know what is) should transwiki this to a new Wiki if he thinks that someone would ever want to read this Doc Strange (talk) 14:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic information.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 15:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete if this info is available elsewhere on the web, or otherwise transwiki to Pipe Organs Wiki (http://pipeorgans.wikia.com/). This info could well be useful, I just don't think en-Wiki is the place for it. The US badly needs an equivalent of Britain's National Pipe Organ Register, which aims to register details of every pipe organ in this country. Such is the size of the US that it might need to be done state-by-state, but that's not for me to decide.--Vox Humana 8' 22:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a repository. Chris Cunningham (talk) 12:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.