Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hustler Honeys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:11, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

List of Hustler Honeys

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

List catalogs non-notable "title," is entirely unsourced (with the consequent BLP problems/violations), and is grossly incomplete with no indication it can be verifiably completed. As a general measure of relative notability, Google News turns up 12 references to "Hustler Honey", compared to roughly 1200 for "Penthouse Pet" and roughly 11,000 for "Playboy Playmate." The list is generally unsourced, and includes entries where models appearing under one-name pseudonyms are associated with the names of more prominent performers, presumably via OR. (There are also many models identified only by first names, which is encyclopedically useless.) Although the magazine has apparently run this feature since the mid-1970s, the list covers only the last few years, without explanation. Finally, highlighting the BLP problem, the list has stood for an extended period of time falsely identifying a real, named person as a "Hustler Honey," and linking to her article, and other, unlinked names potentially raise similar problems. If this identification is appropriate to include in Wikipedia, a category would do the job and reduce if not eliminate the major BLP issues, so long as the related articles meet sourcing requirements. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - The topic of the list does not appear to be notable. No individual article on the list, google doesn't help. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 16:39, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, better served by a category. J I P  | Talk 17:48, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.