Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Imagine video games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is keep and use this article as a target for redirect of individual games (where appropriate). (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 09:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

List of Imagine video games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks in-depth coverage (WP:SIGCOV). Also don't see a viable redirect tagret, as List of Ubisoft games already is just a really crowded and way-too-long table. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 19:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 20:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 20:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep – I'd delete the articles on individual titles in this series first and use any sources listed there to improve this list. It seems like IGN has reviewed a large number of these games. I don't have much trouble finding other sources too: ; ; . I believe this list can stand on its own and I think it may be best to keep it split from the List of Ubisoft games, which is overly crowded as stated. ~ Mable ( chat ) 08:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Delete the individual entries, however, as they don't meet GNG. There are SO MANY games that I fail to believe there are zero mentions of every single one of them. There are a few decent sources in the article, and mentioned above so a list of all of them is viable. Not individual entries though.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Upon review, I agree that the individual should be deleted/redirected to whatever happens to the main article. Also thank you Maplestrip for your expansion of the article; if sufficient in-depth coverage is found for the main series article, I'd be fine with withdrawing the nom. Regarding this latter part, I will check back later today, when I find the time. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 09:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.