Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Inspirational magazines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

List of Inspirational magazines

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

An arbitrary, niche topical list of redlinks. If the author intends to use this as a to-do list, it should be on a user page. Otherwise, it is devoid of content. Salad Days 03:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subjective article title. What is inspirational for one person might be rubbish to the next. All but one of the links are redlinks, and no sources. VegaDark 06:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "Inspirational" in the North American publishing world usually doesn't mean "inspiring"; it almost always means "Christian". If this were "List of Christian-themed magazines", AND if the list was reliably sourced, AND if the bulk of the entries were blue links, I'd vote keep. Unfortunately, I see no reliable sources, the title is POV (non-Christians don't generally use "inspirational" to mean "religious"), and all but one of the links are red. This appears to me to be an unsourced list of indiscriminate information, and I therefore vote to delete. -- Charlene 12:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I have several friends who find Playboy inspirational and I'm pretty sure that's not what this list is intended for. Always going to be a subjective list of indiscriminate information.  The Rambling Man 16:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Subjective title, arbitrary listing, and possibly listcruft. --SunStar Nettalk 16:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete--Rudjek 19:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as "uninspiring" and indiscriminate. Ohconfucius 02:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete not WP material at all NBeale 07:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Biased listcruft. Metrackle 09:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.