Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of International Awards received by Mashrafe Mortaza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article author and sole keep arguer is a sockpuppet. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

List of International Awards received by Mashrafe Mortaza

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Listcruft. Just a collection of stats with no real context and/or notability. See also wikiproject cricket discussion & previous AfD.


 * I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason below:



--আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 17:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 17:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT. Man of the match awards happen in every match, so this isn't a rare achievement so isn't all that notable as a standalone list. StickyWicket (|talk]] (UTC)

man of the match happen in every match but,every player doesn’t get man of the match award in every match. it’s significant for a player and his career I think! If you judge this then hat-trick, 5 wicket hauls,century all are useless. Because if this is all not significant then why this give extra importance in cricket. There have a article about lasith malinga hat-trick so then you say what's the necessary to this article?? delete is not the solution, and people doesn’t get this information easily when they search any sports website,if you search espncricinfo advance option then you get this result. But everyone not aware how to get result of a player century details,hat-trick,man of the match easily. If you merge this article it will be okay or stay as a independent article nothing see any problem. Rasi56 (talk) 04:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect to their player articles - man of the match awards simply aren't that notable, not even in international cricket. If there are particularly significant performances (e.g. in a World Cup final) then those should be mentioned in prose on the player's page. The consensus has generally been that these articles aren't notable in themselves - see Articles for deletion/International awards by Sanath Jayasuriya; my comments on that AfD remain valid - a very selective prose merge may be suitable: copying the entire table across isn't and falls foul of NOTSTATS and CRIC:STYLE. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:23, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think that "List of International Awards received by Mashrafe Mortaza" (and similar for Shakib) is a plausible search term, so a redirect doesn't seem necessary to me. I agree that these lists are not notable; as states, notable performances should be described in the prose, and it would not be inappropriate in those cases to note that the player was named as man of the match.  Harrias  talk 09:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete non encyclopedic. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:30, 16 August

is it not plausible search term?? I provided link go and verify its espn cricinfo stats. And if anyone interested to know about Players man of the match,hat-trick, 5 wicket hauls its best place to read in wikipedia. Because maximum don't know how to search this on espncricinfo. And I don't understand why it not notable?? Then you need to remove every players who have 5 wicket hauls, hat-trick list,list of centuries. This is significant of a player career and all here said that not significant. if this is not notable then why give this??I Think you need to know from any professional commentator or players whats the significant of this. I am a cricket player, and I knew the significant of this awards, centuries,5 wickets etc. You can merge this performance in main article, if needed then convert table info to prose it will suitable. I just give my suggestion, you know better then me. -Rasi56 (talk) 10:59, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I've given my reasons above and in the previous AfD which I linked to. I stand by those judgement calls - this is not a suitable topic for Wikipedia. Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:03, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:LISTCRUFT with no real context. Any exceptional performances are best covered in prose in the main article.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 11:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

bro if this list convert into prose then add in the article awards section it will be ok or not?? -Rasi56 (talk) 11:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

bro table on the main article page,is this okay to add in main article section?? ellyse perry 5 wickets haul see this. Rasi56 (talk) 11:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You need to read the style guide about statistics on the cricket project. If you send the table to a main article without clear and obvious context it will be removed. Thanks for pointing out the Perry article - I've removed the cricket tables from there per CRIC:STYLE. You should know that because some articles are crappy isn't an excuse to make other ones as bad. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:24, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

there have one football table still exist you didn’t remove this. And if I add man of the match awrds in prose/bullet style just like this in Main article awards section  - Can I add this man of the match in this awards I think its significant for player (my opinion). If you tell me then I will add or if you tell me the style of how to write in prose, it will be better. Rasi56 (talk) 16:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * On 14 May 2018, England vs Bd he scored 41*( 2*4, 3*6/2x4,3x6) and he got 2/30.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete both per WP:LISTCRUFT. I came to this AfD following WP:CRICKET. I agree with other members of the Wikiproject Cricket above that these articles are not needed. A few notable mentions can be made in the Subjects Bio, and that should be all that is needed here.-- D Big X ray ᗙ  12:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete both per WP:NOTSTATS WP:LISTCRUFT. We don't need intricate details of every 'man of the match' performance in international matches. Ajf773 (talk) 10:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * We actually have a few more of these lists that could be considered by AfD: Category:Cricket awards and rankings. Ajf773 (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Good spot, see Articles for deletion/List of international awards of David Warner. Harrias  talk 10:44, 21 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.