Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Iran Aseman Airlines destinations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:44, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

List of Iran Aseman Airlines destinations
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails the 2018 RFC on airline designation lists which decided that exhaustive lists of airline destinations are not suitable content for Wikipedia. Per the subsequent AN discussion these should be nominated for deletion in orderly fashion.

Briefly, this is a failure of WP:NOT, particularly WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:NOTCATALOGUE. The WP:NOT issue by itself is sufficient to warrant deletion, but if further reasons are needed it is a clear failure of WP:CORP since the only sources provided are the company's own website and a 404 link to a blog.

I am not WP:BUNDLING these nominations as I think it highly likely that unbundling would be requested. FOARP (talk) 13:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:24, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation, Lists,  and Iran. FOARP (talk) 13:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator and per WP:IINFO. Nythar  (💬-🍀) 02:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment - Hopefully someone will vote here, but if they don't, I guess I should say that I don't agree that this article should be ineligible for soft-deletion. This is because:
 * The article was only nominated for deletion once, in 2015, as part of a mass-nomination of 400 articles. The merits of this particular article were not discussed in that AFD.
 * The 2015 AFD was eight years ago.
 * There is a policy consensus at VPP in 2018 against this article. This should at least count as an additional vote against it if one is missing.
 * There have been a series of AFDs closed recently (see here for a list) in which articles basically the same as this one have been deleted, and the consensus of the 2018 VPP discussion has been re-affirmed in those discussions. FOARP (talk) 10:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, per clearly violating the 2018 consensus and existing precedent and policy. JoelleJay (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.