Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Islamic University of Indonesia people


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

List of Islamic University of Indonesia people

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Directory of people, should be deleted as per NOT Travelbird (talk) 03:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:59, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, without prejudice to re-creation if articles are eventually created for notable people associated with the university (per other "list of X university people" lists). Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 03:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - none of these entries are notable or sourced. In the usual List of x university people, the lists are trimmed to remove non-notable people and footnotes demonstrate that they have a connection with x university.  Apply the rule here would delete all four names. Racepacket (talk) 13:21, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete (without prejudice) per Racepacket; there is no point to listing non-notable people associated with a university. If it turns out that there are sufficient notable people verifiably associated with the university, whether faculty or alumni, then the list can either be recreated (well, started again from scratch), but right now it looks like only one of those listed merits an article, so he can simply be listed in the university's own article.  Also, any individuals who are verifiably significant to the university though not notable could merely be mentioned in the university's own article.  postdlf (talk) 19:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Another absurdly non-notable list that is ripe for parody. Nwlaw63 (talk) 00:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.