Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jam Urban Adventure Characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cabayi (talk) 10:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

List of Jam Urban Adventure Characters

 * – ( View AfD View log )

As the article says, "The following is a list of characters who appear in stories that are related (however tangentially) to the Jammer,". The sources are self-published and merely prove existence. I do not conside this encyclopedic content.  DGG ( talk ) 05:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, no evidence of a WP:LISTN pass, sourcing consists exclusively of primary sources and a search brought up nothing useful. The article consists essentially entirely of in-universe information, meaning that it fails WP:PLOT, which also means that there is no information worth merging anywhere, and the title is not a useful redirect. Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unnecessary content fork that should be summarized in the main articles. There is no real world information present, so there is nothing to merge. TTN (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:LISTN as far as I can see. I agree that there is nothing to be merged. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Entirely comprised of in-universe plot summaries, with nothing but primary sources being used. Searching for additional sources also turns up nothing.  Fails the WP:GNG and WP:LISTN.  Rorshacma (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.