Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jasoosi Dunya (New)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:34, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

List of Jasoosi Dunya (New)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page has a list of the books written by Ibne Safi. Nevertheless, it is more of a catalogue of “Asrar Publishers-Lahore,” which has lately published omnibus volumes containing multiple books, than a books information page. Another page "List of Jasoosi Dunya (Old)" contains a more appropriate and comprehensive list of all the 126 books inked by the author. It, therefore, is strongly recommended that this page shall be deleted and the "List of Jasoosi Dunya (Old)" should be renamed only as "List of Jasoosi Dunya." StarryEyed (talk) 11:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  01:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete Agree with nom on reason for deletion. Take it a step further and merge the list of novels (List of Jasoosi Dunya (Old)) into the series article (Jasoosi Dunya). A series article normally includes the list of books in the series(!) -- Green Cardamom (talk) 06:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  02:32, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.