Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish Members of the National Academy of Engineering


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete Jtkiefer T  23:36, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

List of Jewish Members of the National Academy of Engineering
Delete See reasons listed in List of Jewish Recipients of National Medal of Technology, list of Jewish Fellows of the Royal Society. 72.144.139.115 20:27, 17 November 2005 (UTC) Talk 20:59, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep LazarKr 14:42, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:58, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; It's encyclopedic and there's a positive rationale for pages such as this. &mdash; RJH 17:23, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete One of an infinite amount of pointless lists that have no predecessors or contemporaries. NOTE: The first keep on this list was made by the page creator. Antidote 20:05, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Unnecessary and untypeable Dlyons493


 * Strong keep, see Articles for deletion/List of Jews (2nd nomination), when if anyone delete, please tell my talk page. --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך 07:12, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep someone's scientific views are influenced by their faith. - Mgm|(talk) 16:57, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete As with all other lists of this type. EscapeArtistsNeverDie 05:56, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia isn't a vehicle t boost ethnic pride. Pilatus 19:26, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above 65.10.44.158 22:43, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm hesitant to say this, but this is an unregistered users whose only edits have been on articles for deletion, for deleting, and one on a talk page.--T. Anthony 17:18, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * As I stated in a previous AFD, anonymous users IPs only record their actions on wikipedia up to a certain point - it's likely that this user has had other contributions that aren't recorded in this session. Then again, it might be bad faith attempt - I don't know. But I think it's best to assume best intentions. Antidote 21:30, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Edwardian 23:04, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete useless list.  Grue   20:32, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, please keep all members together regardless of faith or ethnicity. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 22:02, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as with other lists of this type StabRule 23:29, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete--nixie 23:30, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep because nom (72.144.139.115), (65.10.44.158) and StabRule (also 72.144.161.73) are all Bell South users from Atlanta and either co-conspirators or the same person, therefore I have strong distrust of all of these nominations. Peyna 00:40, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The reason I created a name is to prevent from these accusations - which I knew would erupt. I already mentioned the only IP I used for voting here. Also, WP:NPA and assume good faith, as I was expecting attacks of some sort. StabRule 01:20, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Funny how you went back tonight voting on articles with the same anon ip votes. Arniep 01:38, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Jesus Christ, I voted ONCE on each article. The only anon IP I used I already replaced with my username. That simple. I see you and Penya are taking these lists WAY too personally, and I pity you. StabRule 01:42, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Wrong, I don't particularly care about these lists, I care about fair play. Ciao Arniep 01:52, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I merely find it strangely coincidental that 3 people from the same ISP are all voting the same way on the same AfDs and doing nothing else. No one is taking it personally, we're just suspicious of such actions.  I'd like to point out that generally I am opposed to lists like this on Wikipedia, but due to the questionable circumstances at which these arrived on AfD, I feel I must vote to keep.  Keep it civil. Peyna 01:54, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Wikipedian policy claims anon votes are allowed, and given this I see little harm in presenting afd votes to some fellow Wikipedian users given it is their decision to put keep or delete. StabRule 02:02, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * It isn't a vote -  orion  eight  (talk) 02:06, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Then what is it?? StabRule 02:18, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * It's a discussion, whose goal is to achieve consensus. See Wikipedia is not a democracy.  -  orion  eight  (talk) 02:30, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok then. Anons are allowed to participate in this discussion. StabRule 04:31, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * sock puppets aren't. Arniep 14:04, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep. How did I miss this? I think, it would be a lot easier if we set up and AfD section or page just for religion. -- JJay 17:36, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keepor move contents to larger list and redirect. Arniep 17:49, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.