Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Justices of the Kansas Supreme Court


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Neutralitytalk 19:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

List of Justices of the Kansas Supreme Court

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete - This article is not notable to be added on Wikipedia. CharlesWhiteUSA (talk) 11:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. This is one of a sporadic range of nominations for deletion by this editor, including some clearly notable topics. This, in particular, is part of Wikipedia's comprehensive series of lists of state supreme court justices. bd2412  T 12:27, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep No real reason presented for deletion, and topic is obviously notable as a List of for those who have been on Kansas's high court.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 13:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep No reasonable ground for deletion was presented. The individual justices who served on the highest courts of each state generally got a sufficient quality and quantity of coverage in statewide and national publications and in books to qualify individually as satisfying WP:BIO. Many of them have articles already, and those lacking articles have sources such as and  for the earliest redlink justice who actually served on this court. The highest court of each state certainly satisfies WP:ORG. A listing such as this is an important and useful organizational tool for studying how the justices overlapped in their terms.This list is also a tool for developing the encyclopedia, in that its redlinks suggest articles which could be created.  Edison (talk) 13:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Snow keep. State supreme court justices pass WP:POLITICIAN, and this list clearly meets the Wikipedia guidelines for lists.  --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. No particular reason to delete this article given - all these justices are highly publicised and a lot of them have their own articles. Adrianw9 (talk) 15:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.