Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of K-12 Student Newspapers in the United States


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dreadstar †  20:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

List of K-12 Student Newspapers in the United States

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. Unmaintainable list of non-notable elementary school and high school newspapers. ... disco spinster   talk  20:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Per Disco. THE KC (talk) 21:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC).


 * Strong delete per last 2 comments. archanamiya  ·  talk  21:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, utterly unmaintanable and open-ended. KleenupKrew (talk) 22:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete can't possibly see how this fulfills criteria for lists. Nyttend (talk) 23:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep As maintainable as any other list like List of student newspapers in the United States of America List_of_student_newspapers. Don't understand the objections above. ChessCreator (talk) 03:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, first, because it is unmaintainable (according to this, there are 123,385 elementary and secondary schools in the US, a large percent of which have a school paper), and second because a category is better at containing the few notable school newspaper articles we do have. Blast Ulna (talk) 05:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment- okay, 123,385 potential papers, now the above unmaintainable comment makes sense. ChessCreator (talk) 16:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per ChessCreator. God forbid, however, that we should have a category, or separate articles for any of these school papers.  I can see where this would be subject to vandalism, but like Chess, I don't see that it's any less maintainable than other lists of newspapers or schools.  Mandsford (talk) 15:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Far too much possible content. WP:LC applies. Stifle (talk) 18:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - far too big to be maintainable and per WP:NOT. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 03:55, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.