Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kannada songs recorded by P. Susheela


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Less Unless (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

List of Kannada songs recorded by P. Susheela

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NLIST. Note that WP:NOTDATABASE applies. Few, if any, tracks pass WP:NMUSIC. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Lists,  and India.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV. WP:NLIST and WP:V. No effective sources. Content has been copied from commercial sites and almost none of it has standalone notability.   scope_creep Talk  21:52, 25 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - the listing is nowhere an "indiscriminate collection of information". Could only be relevant if WP decided that no list of recorded songs could have a place here. Similar articles do exist with even poorer sourcing. Otherwise it just needs expansion and proper sourcing, not deletion. Most of the films already have enough references and the songs may be traced upon searching on the web. Abbasulu (talk) 11:24, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - deletion, as I said before, is not the course of action, expansion is. Until we agree on one firm policy concerning all lists of recorded songs by singers, we shouldn't treat this one any differently. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  15:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * None of the you are making an argument from policy. It is unsourced. If it was kept, all the non-sourced content will be removed.   scope_creep Talk  21:52, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I find that the policies cited are not very relevant at all. WP:NOTDATABASE isn't very relevant here IMO. WP:SIGCOV indeed is - that's why I'm saying this is how we should work. And I don't think blanking content is the right course of action, tagging them should be enough, and inviting community members to contribute should help. I'm an inclusionist, I must confess. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  01:27, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * They are exactly relevant and your lack of experience is evidenced by the fact that you don't understand what your talking about.    scope_creep Talk  16:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @Scope creep: Speaking of policy then, read WP:NPA. You are hereby warned to refrain from commenting on editors and restrict yourself to discussing content. This message was rude and uncalled for, and such behaviour will not be tolerated again. My years of experience, contribution and achievements on Wikipedia speak for themselves, but I don't recall having asked for your opinion. Hope it is clear now. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  20:42, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I put the wrong name into the Afd Stats, as it was pointed out. Sorry.   scope_creep Talk  22:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NLIST, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:VERIFY. Onel 5969  TT me 21:18, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to P. Susheela. Fails WP:NLIST per nom. Part of the list can be covered there. SBKSPP (talk) 01:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - fails WP:V, a Wikipedia policy Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete As per reasoning by Onel5969 above. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.