Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kanohi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Toa (Bionicle). Everyone agrees to remove this as a standalone article, with a small majority in favor of ending up with a redirect to Toa (Bionicle). Per RoySmith and Not a very active user, there doesn't seem to be much worth merging, but it will still be there in the page history if anyone wants to give it a shot. ST47 (talk) 22:59, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

List of Kanohi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication about the subject's real-world notability. All the sources in the page seem to be primary. Not a very active user (talk) 10:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 10:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 10:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge with Toa, the primary users of Kanohi. No need for standalone article. Toa Nidhiki05 12:14, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 03:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Trivial list of plot details that belongs on Fandom. TTN (talk) 11:21, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge with Toa.4meter4 (talk) 18:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Toa. At first glance, the suggestion to merge seems like a reasonable application of WP:ATD, but this article is all poorly-sourced fancruft, so at best, a very limited merge.  The problem is, the target is also a pile of poorly-source francruft, and a merge of this poorly-sourced material would make it even worse.  -- RoySmith (talk) 15:09, 5 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.