Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kelly Clarkson Remixes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 04:48, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

List of Kelly Clarkson Remixes
The article is non-notable and not required considering these remixes of Kelly Clarkson singles have already been placed in the appropriate articles. Therefore, I nominate this article for deletion. &mdash;Eternal Equinox | talk 02:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no need for seperate article -- † Ðy§ep§ion † Speak your mind 02:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Flowerparty ■ 03:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Cnwb 03:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 04:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn per nom.Blnguyen 05:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  08:06, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge & delete or delete. I don't see why a summary can't go into the Clarkson article. If the whole list is merged, the resulting redirect will be a poor one ("List of Kelly Clarkson Remixes" is an unlikely search term), so I'd delete it. ENCEPHALON  08:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge in to Kelly Clarkson article Jcuk 08:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 09:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Encephalon. Savidan 11:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Kill the listcruft. This can easily go onto the Clarkson article.--み使い Mitsukai 13:48, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as listcruft. Compu  te  r  Jo  e  19:46, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge - Merge into Kelly Clarkson  Tvaughn05 e   (Talk)  (Contribs)  22:36, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not worthy of an article or list.JohnnyBGood 01:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I bolded your vote so that it is easier to locate. &mdash;Eternal Equinox | talk 15:09, 11 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, convenient list. Kappa 09:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Could you explain why this list is convenient? The majority of the remixes have already been placed in the appropriate individual articles so its existence has become questionable. Do we really require a list that does not even state who the singer is and does not even contain a lead section? &mdash;Eternal Equinox | talk 14:14, 12 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.