Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kenyan blogs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A perfectly clear consensus. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

List of Kenyan blogs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't fit the WP:GNG Domdeparis (talk) 17:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Only one entry links to an article, and even that has been tagged to question its notability: no evidence for potential notability of any of the other entries Noyster (talk),  10:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 12:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not a notable thing to be a blogger from Kenya, has nothing to do wrt Kenya, don't wanna be accused of cultural bias. =) But the nationality of the writer is not a notable or interesting characteristic to justify a list. ValarianB (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE Jergling (talk) 20:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 20:45, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. Timothy Joseph Wood  20:47, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing on this article gives even 1% of a chance this could possible pass WP:GNG. Ajf773 (talk) 17:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - appears arbitrary and not encyclopedic at least in current scope and presentation. Sagecandor (talk) 02:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.