Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kirati kings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep/no consensus. MezzoMezzo delete comment is not policy based, and the keep commentators mentioned it can be sourced. But a debate needs to be mentioned about this as a reliable source, but that is a cleanup issue that needs to be discussed on the talk page. If not bring it back here. Secret account 22:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

List of Kirati kings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources. No links. GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I couldn't find other sources. Please help to find it as this is historical kings of Nepal. Thanks Ashishlohorung (talk) 00:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Ashishlohorung. Where did you get your information? Is this list something you compiled yourself? Where elsewhere can other readers find this same information? GeorgeLouis (talk) 01:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Did you not notice the references section at the bottom of the list? The website is questionable as a reliable source, but the book at least should have been looked into further before listing this at AFD under the incorrect claim that there are no sources. postdlf (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaca  tion  9  00:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)


 * OK. Maybe the tag should be "Inline' instead. I can go with that. Normally an editor who has access to a book should at least the page numbers of the book. Thanks for writing. GeorgeLouis (talk) 05:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's a list containing items of which not a single one has it's own article on Wikipedia, and this article is supported only by a singular source. It's a pointless waste of space. MezzoMezzo (talk) 11:00, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment- article certainly to improve with contents/sources. It seems a notable topic.--Knight of Infinity (talk) 17:41, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The information is verifiable per this, and in my opinion highly notable. --Cerebellum (talk) 12:30, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is now a source for this list, and at least some of the kings may be Notable enough for their own articles. GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.