Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Knight's Cross recipients 6th SS Gebirgs Division Nord


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

List of Knight's Cross recipients 6th SS Gebirgs Division Nord

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An unnecessary cross-categorisation created when the awarding of the Knight's Cross was accepted on Wiki as a presumption of notability. Since then, the community consensus has evolved and the awarding of the Knight's Cross no longer carries such a presumption; please see the close at Redirect proposal for Knight's Cross winners. Lists of similar scope have been recently deleted at AfD, such as:
 * AfD: List of Knight's Cross recipients 17th SS Division
 * AfD: List of Knight's Cross recipients of the 22nd SS Division
 * AfD: List of highly-decorated German pilots of ground attack aircraft

In addition, I'm nominating similar articles created in the same timeframe. The rationale above is equally applicable to these lists:

K.e.coffman (talk) 18:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:09, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:09, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:09, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:10, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  20:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete all. We should be consistent.-- Jim in Georgia  Contribs  Talk  23:25, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per precedent. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OUTCOMES and WP:SNOW. None of these are likely to pass our standards for lists. Bearian (talk) 22:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Splitting the list by unit seems to be more meaningful than by first letter(s) of surname. Peter James (talk) 13:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, the alphabetical lists serve as the target pages for the redirects. I don't think that wikipedia needs both. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The redirects can go to wherever the names are listed. Peter James (talk) 21:10, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.