Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of La que se avecina characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to La que se avecina.  Sandstein  08:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

List of La que se avecina characters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Split from main article 1 without reasoning. If it's superfluous to the main article, I don't see that it warrants an entire article of its own. The main article still contains an extensive list of these characters, so this article might be more appropriately titled Character appearances in La que se avecina, a topic which I don't believe is notable. Pontificalibus (talk) 15:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  15:59, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  15:59, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  15:59, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep because this is how you do a WP:SS breakout, and if you want to start a merge discussion, this is the wrong place. You're arguing for re-merging the content, not deleting it, and AfD is not Articles for "Discussion". Nor is AfD for cleanup. Jclemens (talk) 05:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not arguing for a remerge, I am arguing for delete per WP:AVOIDSPLIT - this topic (character appearances) isn't notable. What happens at the main article with regard to reverting deletions doesn't really concern me. --Pontificalibus (talk) 08:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * At no point does WP:AVOIDSPLIT justify the deletion of anything; and even if it did, it's an editing guideline, while WP:ATD-M is policy. Jclemens (talk) 10:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Your rationale for keep was that this was split from another article. I am pointing to WP:AVOIDSPLIT and saying just because it was split, doesn't mean it should be kept - it shouldn't have been split in the first place if it wasn't a notable topic. I suggest it was only split because it was excessive detail for the main article, and the proper response to that should have been to edit that article. Because the split should not have been made in the first place I am arguing for delete. There is no need for a merge because the edit in the main article removing this table can simply be undone. --Pontificalibus (talk) 10:38, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * No, you're not arguing that the content be removed from Wikipedia, so you're arguing for a re- or un-merge. Deletion means that no merger, no redirection is appropriate, and that's clearly not the case here. Merging and redirection also cause content not to exist as a separate article, rather than for it to be removed such that no non-administrators can see it. That is what is different about deletion, and why I don't believe what you're advocating is best called "deletion." Jclemens (talk) 23:35, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * To make it clear I am arguing that this table be deleted. How many times do I need to say that? However, this is not the place to mandate that this table not be restored in the main article.--Pontificalibus (talk) 07:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge with La que se avicena.Vorbee (talk) 07:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:49, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge back to the main article. Not notable by itself. Renata (talk) 01:22, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge back to main article per Renata. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 13:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge back to main article. Just a small single list, doesn't need a new article. ! dave  09:55, 16 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.