Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Labour Party Members of the London Assembly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to London Assembly election, 2012.  MBisanz  talk 21:07, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

List of Labour Party Members of the London Assembly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is badly out of date (the list is from the 2004 election and Ken Livingstone has not been mayor since May 2008). It has been marked as an orphan for a considerable period of time and there are no equivalent lists of members from other parties. London Assembly election, 2012 does the job fine. DavidCane (talk) 01:06, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Is this a proposed merge then, not a proposed deletion? הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 02:09, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No. Because this list is so out of date and redundant, there is nothing worth merging.--DavidCane (talk) 02:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to London Assembly election, 2012 which contains the information. It's irrelevant whether or not there are pages about other parties, but there's another page with more up-to-date information. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - information already exist at London Assembly election, 2012 (and any subsequent election article). KTC (talk) 17:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete -- the subject is adequately covered by London Assembly and the articles, linked from it for the elections to it. I would vote the same if this were a similar article on Tory or Liberal Democrat members.  The article has clearly not been maintained for a long time.  Articles that need to be maintained are generally undesirable, because they do go out of date.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.