Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Las Vegas Strip hotels


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 03:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

List of Las Vegas Strip hotels

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article is past its WP:HALFLIFE. Most hotels currently on the strip are missing from this list. There is already a Locations of major landmarks section on the Las Vegas Strip article, so this article is practically unneeded since people can easily find the info on an article with much higher traffic and a more recognizable topic. In fact, if you look at said section of the article, you will notice that some hotels listed on it are not even in the proposed article! There is also a WP:CITATIONS issue on this article. - Brought to you by the Wright Brothers, the one and only Airplane Master (talk) 03:11, 29 October 2020 (UTC)!
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 03:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. Ehh, as anti-list as I am, this is actually a reasonable one to have. The Strip is pretty well known for its hotels/casinos, and this is collating things we have articles on together with some basic info.  If challenged, I'm sure I could dig up some sources to show WP:NLIST is met, but this is such a famous destination, that I think that won't really be needed here.  Otherwise, the main issue seems how best to organize information.  Keeping all this together in a list is reasonable, but it wouldn't be reasonable to just dump it all into the main article because it's too long for that.  There may be some room to redo this all somewhat, but I don't think deletion is really a good call for that here. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 03:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I also vote for deletion for most lists but this one stands out, per above. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 05:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Perfect valid list, aids in navigation, linking related items that have their own articles.  D r e a m Focus  10:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - article might well be out of date but it's certainly a notable topic and the list does have a navigational purpose since most of its entries have stand-alone articles Spiderone  11:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: per the above.  // Timothy ::  talk  08:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.