Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Law & Order trivia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was thrown out. You cannot merge and delete. These options are not compatible. Mackensen (talk) 15:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

List of Law & Order trivia
I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance, especially items of unimportant information. This puts the article in direct conflict with my understanding of the following Wikipedia guidelines:


 * 1) Articles title assumes that the information therin is trivial, violating NPOV
 * 2) If we are to assume that the articles information is indeed trivial then it is violating Imporance.
 * 3) Finally being that a trivia list is inherintly a list of random facts, this article is in violation of What Wikipedia is not.

Some or all of the information in this artile may be good however, it should be integrated into proper places within established articles. For advice on how this may be accomplished you might want to look at: Trivia and User:GK/On adding trivia to the main body of an article. The_stuart 17:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and delete per nom. no place in an encyclopedia Caveat lector 19:03, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into the article Law & Order as a trivia/interesting facts section. Dcflyer 20:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Article is mistitled as 'trivia,' could be titled List of Law & Order facts Dcflyer 12:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, trivia. Pavel Vozenilek 20:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and delete Merge any interesting info into the main article. If there's too much info for main article, yet it is important and it needs a place, I'd appreciate the article's creator adding his views. Are we developing any policy on trivia additions to articles? It seems to be becoming a problem, taking over some articles. --DanielCD 20:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.