Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Lew Carpenter cites


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete, per WP:SNOW and author's insight. Will ask creator whether to be userfied Tikiwont (talk) 18:31, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

List of Lew Carpenter cites

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Mind-bogglingly non-encyclopedic index of every time a particular jock is mentioned in a particular book about his team!!!! Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:14, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Wow. Never has an article better spoken to its own deletion than this one.  -- Jayron  32  02:35, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Come on now. RomeEonBmbo (talk) 02:58, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per everybody above. Wikipedia is not a place to post indexes of books -- whether or not those books have indexes of their own. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:11, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:FAIL —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eskimo.the (talk • contribs) 03:22, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above reasons.  jsfouche  &#9789;&#9790;   talk  03:39, 20 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - An attempt to be bold, and to explain or cite to 10% of pages in a book that mentioned Lew Carpenter. Obviously, too bold and beyond accepted limits. Jrcrin001 (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. May even be able to go under WP:NONSENSE rules. TheFSAviator &bull; T 04:31, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. This is basically a concordance to a book to find all the references to Lew Carpenter. For each page where Carpenter is mentioned, this list provides an excerpt from the line where he is mentioned. I would consider this list useless, but not WP:NONSENSE, which uses a restrictive definition of "nonsense" that would exclude this page. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:09, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete immediately via WP:SPEEDY.--Johnsemlak (talk) 06:45, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Just an aside, would it be worthwhile to userfy this to the user that created it; they have been working on the Lew Carpenter article, and this may be useful for them to have on-wiki, even if it isn't really an article, it may be misplaced and really belong in his userspace. I totally agree that it doesn't belong in the article space, but it may have some use for the user that created it.  -- Jayron  32  07:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * If the article creator asks for this page to be userfied, I would support having it userfied. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Way out of scope. —  C M B J   12:52, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.