Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania statewide and federal candidates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania. Merge is not strictly the consensus opinion here, but most commenters are OK with it, and WP:ATD argues for it. Some people preferred a partial merge, so use your best judgement on how much content to move. No consensus on whether to leave a redirect behind, so I'll leave that up to whoever does the merge. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

List of Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania statewide and federal candidates

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

List of non-notable candidates from a small party with fails WP:N. TM 11:54, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 12:00, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 12:00, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge with Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania- statewide candidates for one of the larger third parties has some notability.--Rusf10 (talk) 19:37, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Well-referenced, useful, and I would not say the Libertarian Party is a "small party", it's notable for sure. Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania is not necessarily a bad idea but that page is in far worse shape than this one, at this time, so if that one were improved, I might support a merge then. Srt8 Outta Philly (talk) 19:42, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Sources linked only provide routine coverage expected during any election cycle (even fringe candidates get the occasional news mention), and none of the candidates were elected. I think that the article could be partially merged with the Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania article, including the specific ideological positions expressed by the candidates without much reference to the candidates themselves. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 20:07, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom ... or perhaps because I am part of a secret government agency assigned to discredit the Libertarian Party. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:39, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:LISTN - none of these are notable individuals. I do however think a merge of the content to Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania (e.g. as an electoral record/history) is possible, I don't think we need a redirect (though not opposed).Icewhiz (talk) 08:12, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete or partially Merge per above reasons regarding lack of notability of list items, i.e. individuals. -The Gnome (talk) 16:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.