Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Loose Women episodes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

List of Loose Women episodes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources. Lack Notability. Matt14451 (talk) 15:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning)  talk  15:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Loose Women is notable, and the episodes of a notable series are verifiable. So the nominator does not raise any valid complaints here. But as this is a talk show and not the kind of series for which we presumptively list episode-specific information, there is still a possible basis for deletion. So let's focus on that... postdlf (talk) 16:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
 * There aren't any sources in the article at present. The only way to check would be to watch the episode as it airs but that can't be linked. There was a maintenance tag on the page. It's a valid complaint. The information seems too specific as well. The number of episodes that each panelist/presenter has appeared on is sufficient in the main article. Matt14451 (talk) 16:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Sourcing is only relevant to deletion if it can't be sourced, so no, what is "in the article at present" is not relevant to deletion (and no, watching a TV show when it originally airs is not the only way to verify its contents, unless you've somehow time traveled to the 1950s). The second part of your comment is on the right track as far as what is relevant here. postdlf (talk) 16:41, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The article is "unverifiable" (violates WP:V), "original research" (violates WP:NOR), and "non-notable" in cases where the subject does not meet their respective notability criteria. There's no way to check who was on the panel in the first episodes. Matt14451 (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:00, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:00, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:00, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: if the problem is WP:CHALLENGE of all contents of the article, it can be deleted according to WP:PAGEBLANKING. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:52, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sourcing and seemingly cannot be sourced, so failing WP:No original research. I would happily change my mind if someone can provide adequate sourcing for all the episodes of just one series, assuming good faith that the remainder could similarly be sourced. Until and unless that happens, though, it's a delete from me. Fish +Karate  14:17, 25 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.