Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Luigi's Mansion's ghosts history


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 00:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

List of Luigi's Mansion's ghosts history


Article is a unreferenced, filled with original research, fancruft, and listcruft to boot. Original research is blatant, there is even a sentence that says "...but my guess is".  Dooms Day34  9  22:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Zenrutn 23:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * "Vincent Van Gore The Starving Artist - based on his name, he starved to death" - does that mean because he was called "Vincent Van Gore The Starving Artist" he was already predestined to starve to death, or... never mind. Delete - OR. Bubba hotep 23:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Yeah, article is loaded with junk like that. They are interesting theories though; I wonder if there is a place we could point the user that did the most of this to?   Dooms  Day34  9  00:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - OR, WP:NOT. -- Renesis (talk) 00:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. This is 100% original research. I've played through this game before - I don't remember a single bit of this being in the game. --- RockMFR 01:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR. Or perhaps userfy, so the article's creator doesn't lose his work. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 10:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Is complete crap and is not official at all. BTW, sorry; I thought I signed this earlier. My bad. 138.217.214.192 06:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.   RON   Let's talk  01:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete-Nothing is furnished herwith inorder to do factual verification. Nileena joseph (Talk 04:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy. Original research, but still appropriate for the user space. Alex Nisnevich 22:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.