Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Macintosh models by case type


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:ITSUSEFUL is a weak argument if put against the WP:SYNTH concerns.  Sandstein  08:37, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

List of Macintosh models by case type

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Deleted via prod, resurrected via Refund as "useful", but there's nothing encyclopedic about this. Reliable source are not creating indexes of Mac models by case types, and the end result is an unreferenced gallery with a lot of original research (how some models are arbitrarily broken apart, for example the "slim unibody" versus "unibody" iMacs.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 17:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 17:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete not “useful” and apparently a lot of very detailed SYNTH. Mccapra (talk) 19:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, complete synthesis of unrelated ideas. No sources back up the completely arbitrary division system. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:24, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, I think it is useful, for example, for a student who is doing a project on the evolution of computer design. Apple is one of the most representative brands in terms of design. A list like this allows you to see this evolution at a glance. Mrodriguezmad (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.