Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Magiranger spells


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete --Haemo 01:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

List of Magiranger spells

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This list of fictional spells lacks any real world context, is not notable outside of the ficitonal universe, and cannot be cited with secondary sources to meet WP:FICT, also is plot information Pilotbob 03:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Also see WP:NOT Pilotbob 04:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep : Deleting an article is not the first response to bad content. Fix it first. All of this seems to be in response to the keep of another article in the same series. We do not delete articles because of WP:NOT. We fix them.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 04:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, this is one of the few articles that I wouldn't care if it were gone. It's just a list of shit from the episodes, and serves no real purpose. The character lists and character biographies that were also listed for deletion concurrently are those that I think should not be deleted.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 04:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions.   -- Pilotbob 12:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, clearly absolutely no notability in the real world. Not even going to bother listing policies. Doctorfluffy 19:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * stronger delete than Doctorfluffy, at least until I see a good reason for someone to know the intricate details of the physics of spellcasting in a TV series beyond the small paragraph included in the main series article, and can find some sorts of 3rd-party treatments of it to add as sources. WP:OR too. I think the old Lightsaber combat article is a strange parallel to this. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 02:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Even stronger delete than AllGloryToTheHypnotoad as article has no primary or secondary sources, and is comprised of in universe plot summary with no real-world context. --Gavin Collins 08:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: That's right, we must delete this trivial article that's only useful to a few thousand people in order to save electrons. Remember, save those electrons, they're more important than you think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.139.148.100 (talk) 17:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.