Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Masonic investigations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:26, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

List of Masonic investigations

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A list with a single item doesn't need an article -- especially when the investigation didn't find what the article claims it found. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:21, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 20:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I hate to suggest a speedy without proof, but, of the editor's 37 edits, I can't find one which is demonstrably not vandalism, except for his comments on his own talk page, which are merely personal attacks.  We can only speedy delete if he's the sock of a banned editor.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 21:14, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I found a trivial overlinking edit in mainspace which could not be described as vandalism. Still, there should be some speedy deletion criterion.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 21:32, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: Article creator is indefinitely blocked, so it's unlikely we'll hear from him. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 05:03, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete title... but perhaps merge content. The article consists of one paragraph that would be best presented in context by being merged into Morgan_Affair. As it is, however, notability of the topic is not established .. the only source cited in this "list" is is a single primary source... we would need a secondary source to establish notability. Blueboar (talk) 00:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge or redirect a one item list is not going anywhere. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:35, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.